<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Angry Brown Guy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://angrybrownguy.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://angrybrownguy.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Random rants or posts by a Brown Guy who is not always Angry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Politics and Soccer by Mike D.</title>
		<link>http://angrybrownguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/13/politics-and-soccer/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angrybrownguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/13/politics-and-soccer/#comment-81</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree with Olbermann (unsurprising).  While I agree that the racially-sensitive comments weren&#039;t necessary, I certainly agree with Ferraro&#039;s basic premise of scrutiny division.  Throughout the campaign the lion&#039;s share of scrutiny has been placed on Hillary, probably 80-90%.  I certainly don&#039;t feel it to be racially driven, but I definitely feel that it could be sexist driven.  People and the media are latching on to an outdated belief that women aren&#039;t in the top seat, and thus must prove themselves worthy 10x over.  That&#039;s the real issue at play, if any.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree with Olbermann (unsurprising).  While I agree that the racially-sensitive comments weren&#8217;t necessary, I certainly agree with Ferraro&#8217;s basic premise of scrutiny division.  Throughout the campaign the lion&#8217;s share of scrutiny has been placed on Hillary, probably 80-90%.  I certainly don&#8217;t feel it to be racially driven, but I definitely feel that it could be sexist driven.  People and the media are latching on to an outdated belief that women aren&#8217;t in the top seat, and thus must prove themselves worthy 10x over.  That&#8217;s the real issue at play, if any.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Hilary Clinton A Muslim? by Mike D.</title>
		<link>http://angrybrownguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/09/is-hilary-clinton-a-muslim/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angrybrownguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/09/is-hilary-clinton-a-muslim/#comment-80</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe he didn&#039;t make a &quot;Rock &#039;em Sock &#039;em Robots&quot; reference.  It was right there and ready for it.  :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe he didn&#8217;t make a &#8220;Rock &#8216;em Sock &#8216;em Robots&#8221; reference.  It was right there and ready for it.  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Hilary Clinton A Muslim? by jollywhitegiant</title>
		<link>http://angrybrownguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/09/is-hilary-clinton-a-muslim/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>jollywhitegiant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angrybrownguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/09/is-hilary-clinton-a-muslim/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>video must have gotten a DMCA takedown.. no longer available, sads :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>video must have gotten a DMCA takedown.. no longer available, sads <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Freudian Slip &#8211; 9/11 Style by Mike D.</title>
		<link>http://angrybrownguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/02/freudian-slip-911-style/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 04:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angrybrownguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/02/freudian-slip-911-style/#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Also, the last CNN clip -- since the analogy was &quot;The planes were being used as missiles for attack,&quot; it&#039;s not surprising that the guy said missile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, the last CNN clip &#8212; since the analogy was &#8220;The planes were being used as missiles for attack,&#8221; it&#8217;s not surprising that the guy said missile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Freudian Slip &#8211; 9/11 Style by Mike D.</title>
		<link>http://angrybrownguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/02/freudian-slip-911-style/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 04:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angrybrownguy.wordpress.com/2008/03/02/freudian-slip-911-style/#comment-77</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry Faraz, but I can&#039;t, in good conscience, agree or support statements coming from any website (100777.com) that deems an Israeli state a mortal enemy, in their case solely by a linkage to a military company.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We&#039;re all aware that there is an enemy somewhere, and conspiracy theories more often than not can, in-fact, lead to further uncoverings of truth.  I think the best example of this is in the dispute over extra-terrestrial life.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In searching for ET, however, we&#039;re not deeming any fellow human social, religious, or cultural groups as &quot;mortal enemies&quot; or making them out to be any less worthy as human beings.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;ve long believed that conspiracy theories, especially in the 9-11 case, can be more dangerous than beneficial.  A video I found on YouTube claims to &quot;prove the demolition of WTC7&quot; by pointing out incorrect times in terms of collapse reporting.  The danger, however, is not in the posting of such claims and ideas itself, but rather in it&#039;s wake, the comments and accusations afterwards.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Comments on websites and videos such as these always include &quot;It was the (expletive) Jews&quot; or &quot;Israel shouldn&#039;t exist and yet we aid them.&quot;  The spawn of such postings is not rational discussion and discourse, but rather blind hatred.  It is my fear that through such posts, we are creating the doubt and confusion in uninformed and swayable viewers&#039; minds in which hate groups, dangerous propaganda, and other vile information can filter in.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I don&#039;t have a side or thought on to whether or not 9-11 was a hoax.  However, the spread of the resulting commentary hatred and propaganda MUST BE STOPPED at all costs.  I liken it to the old shortwave radio, where Russian and Nazi propaganda spewed across the air and attempted to brainwash listeners into believing an unacceptable agenda.  That is the real tragedy to come out of all of this.  We could in fact be feeding the evil while trying to prove wild claims when maybe the situation ought to just be let go.  We would be doing no justice to the 3,000+ who died if we fuel further atrocities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry Faraz, but I can&#8217;t, in good conscience, agree or support statements coming from any website (100777.com) that deems an Israeli state a mortal enemy, in their case solely by a linkage to a military company.  </p>
<p>We&#8217;re all aware that there is an enemy somewhere, and conspiracy theories more often than not can, in-fact, lead to further uncoverings of truth.  I think the best example of this is in the dispute over extra-terrestrial life.  </p>
<p>In searching for ET, however, we&#8217;re not deeming any fellow human social, religious, or cultural groups as &#8220;mortal enemies&#8221; or making them out to be any less worthy as human beings.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve long believed that conspiracy theories, especially in the 9-11 case, can be more dangerous than beneficial.  A video I found on YouTube claims to &#8220;prove the demolition of WTC7&#8243; by pointing out incorrect times in terms of collapse reporting.  The danger, however, is not in the posting of such claims and ideas itself, but rather in it&#8217;s wake, the comments and accusations afterwards.  </p>
<p>Comments on websites and videos such as these always include &#8220;It was the (expletive) Jews&#8221; or &#8220;Israel shouldn&#8217;t exist and yet we aid them.&#8221;  The spawn of such postings is not rational discussion and discourse, but rather blind hatred.  It is my fear that through such posts, we are creating the doubt and confusion in uninformed and swayable viewers&#8217; minds in which hate groups, dangerous propaganda, and other vile information can filter in.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a side or thought on to whether or not 9-11 was a hoax.  However, the spread of the resulting commentary hatred and propaganda MUST BE STOPPED at all costs.  I liken it to the old shortwave radio, where Russian and Nazi propaganda spewed across the air and attempted to brainwash listeners into believing an unacceptable agenda.  That is the real tragedy to come out of all of this.  We could in fact be feeding the evil while trying to prove wild claims when maybe the situation ought to just be let go.  We would be doing no justice to the 3,000+ who died if we fuel further atrocities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Crazy Dunk! by HHSfan</title>
		<link>http://angrybrownguy.wordpress.com/2008/02/28/crazy-dunk/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>HHSfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angrybrownguy.wordpress.com/2008/02/28/crazy-dunk/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>We are about 180 miles East of Portland. &lt;br/&gt;Another interesting fact is, Hermiston High is also where former Boise St. QB Jared Zabransky(now with the Steelers)graduated from. &lt;br/&gt;JJ is an amazing player...this was not a fluke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are about 180 miles East of Portland. <br />Another interesting fact is, Hermiston High is also where former Boise St. QB Jared Zabransky(now with the Steelers)graduated from. <br />JJ is an amazing player&#8230;this was not a fluke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Crazy Dunk! by Mike D.</title>
		<link>http://angrybrownguy.wordpress.com/2008/02/28/crazy-dunk/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 05:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angrybrownguy.wordpress.com/2008/02/28/crazy-dunk/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>J.J. Ross, apparently the HS is somewhere in Oregon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J.J. Ross, apparently the HS is somewhere in Oregon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
